<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coworkers Considered Harmful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/</link>
	<description>blogging / programming / technology / lifehacks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I Can Has Ruby? &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-123773</link>
		<dc:creator>I Can Has Ruby? &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-123773</guid>
		<description>[...] of a new language. Obviously, the internet is a gateway drug. I tried out Ruby mainly as a way of increasing my own job satisfaction after I had heard so many good things about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of a new language. Obviously, the internet is a gateway drug. I tried out Ruby mainly as a way of increasing my own job satisfaction after I had heard so many good things about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog-thing : Digest for October 2007</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-99489</link>
		<dc:creator>blog-thing : Digest for October 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-99489</guid>
		<description>[...] Coworkers Considered Harmful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coworkers Considered Harmful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-87795</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-87795</guid>
		<description>{shudder} I remember those days so well. Now as a consultant, things are a little easier since I manage myself - which is a full time job in itself - and my only coworker is myself. I do have clients though, which is another problem entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>{shudder} I remember those days so well. Now as a consultant, things are a little easier since I manage myself &#8211; which is a full time job in itself &#8211; and my only coworker is myself. I do have clients though, which is another problem entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Link Post 12 &#171; Rhonda Tipton&#8217;s WebLog</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-85900</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Link Post 12 &#171; Rhonda Tipton&#8217;s WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-85900</guid>
		<description>[...] Tape&#160;lists a number of coworker induced workplace failures ways to avoid them in the article Coworkers Considered Harmful. [via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tape&nbsp;lists a number of coworker induced workplace failures ways to avoid them in the article Coworkers Considered Harmful. [via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: talkni</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82763</link>
		<dc:creator>talkni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82763</guid>
		<description>entech says: 
&quot;one good easily point out that one of the biggest failures when it comes to programming is worrying more about the code than a finished product that works...&quot;

and I absolutely agree. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>entech says:<br />
&#8220;one good easily point out that one of the biggest failures when it comes to programming is worrying more about the code than a finished product that works&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>and I absolutely agree. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82720</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82720</guid>
		<description>That comments ninja thingy of yours is pretty cool, btw.

Teams do not always succeed, particularly when they - DUH - don&#039;t work together. This means, by definition, that compatibility and proactive communication are critical in long-distance or even cubicle farm teams. Unless you share a space, you won&#039;t have cohesion naturally. I&#039;ve worked remotely with people I&#039;ve been so compatible with I could finish their sentences or blog posts and they wouldn&#039;t even notice. I&#039;ve worked across the fuzzy grey cubicle wall from people who were plotting against me on the phone, even as I was typing what they were saying into an email to my blog.

Just stapling people together is not the same thing as building a team, and ensuring the staples don&#039;t come out is not the same thing as managing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That comments ninja thingy of yours is pretty cool, btw.</p>
<p>Teams do not always succeed, particularly when they &#8211; DUH &#8211; don&#8217;t work together. This means, by definition, that compatibility and proactive communication are critical in long-distance or even cubicle farm teams. Unless you share a space, you won&#8217;t have cohesion naturally. I&#8217;ve worked remotely with people I&#8217;ve been so compatible with I could finish their sentences or blog posts and they wouldn&#8217;t even notice. I&#8217;ve worked across the fuzzy grey cubicle wall from people who were plotting against me on the phone, even as I was typing what they were saying into an email to my blog.</p>
<p>Just stapling people together is not the same thing as building a team, and ensuring the staples don&#8217;t come out is not the same thing as managing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82527</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82527</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82059&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mitch&lt;/a&gt;:

I&#039;m handing out Code Complete for christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82059" rel="nofollow">Mitch</a>:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m handing out Code Complete for christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82524</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82524</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82068&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talkni&lt;/a&gt;:

one good easily point out that one of the biggest failures when it comes to programming is worrying more about the code than a finished product that works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82068" rel="nofollow">talkni</a>:</p>
<p>one good easily point out that one of the biggest failures when it comes to programming is worrying more about the code than a finished product that works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82520</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82520</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82097&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;raincoaster&lt;/a&gt;:

Thanks. The one good counterpoint I&#039;ve seen in the reddit comments is that what I&#039;m suggesting is really going against being a team player...

but I think the general gist comes across that at this point the team cohesion has already failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82097" rel="nofollow">raincoaster</a>:</p>
<p>Thanks. The one good counterpoint I&#8217;ve seen in the reddit comments is that what I&#8217;m suggesting is really going against being a team player&#8230;</p>
<p>but I think the general gist comes across that at this point the team cohesion has already failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82519</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82519</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82105&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thatpessimist&lt;/a&gt;:

just a FYI, if you go to wordpress.com Dashboard &gt;&gt; Users &gt;&gt; Your Profile and set your website under Contact Info then you won&#039;t have to manually type your blog url in comments. It will be done automatically for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82105" rel="nofollow">thatpessimist</a>:</p>
<p>just a FYI, if you go to wordpress.com Dashboard &gt;&gt; Users &gt;&gt; Your Profile and set your website under Contact Info then you won&#8217;t have to manually type your blog url in comments. It will be done automatically for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatpessimist</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82105</link>
		<dc:creator>thatpessimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82105</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s this guy at my job that checks in code that either:
#1 Doesn&#039;t work at all 
#2 Doesn&#039;t work the way it used to 
#3 Ends up causing problems by affecting something else

I think it comes down to simply testing your code thoroughly before checking it in.. which my co-worker simply doesn&#039;t understand.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s this guy at my job that checks in code that either:<br />
#1 Doesn&#8217;t work at all<br />
#2 Doesn&#8217;t work the way it used to<br />
#3 Ends up causing problems by affecting something else</p>
<p>I think it comes down to simply testing your code thoroughly before checking it in.. which my co-worker simply doesn&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82097</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetducttape.com/2007/10/15/coworkers-considered-harmful/#comment-82097</guid>
		<description>This has applications wider than the software world, for sure.

Welcome back to WP Top Posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has applications wider than the software world, for sure.</p>
<p>Welcome back to WP Top Posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
